Continuation of article R.7.
Reminder:
The term « BASE » is used for an element when it designates a specific point (or field, or angle) from which a situation is perceived.
The Yparcho system describes 4 points of perception:
1- The « Imagination of Entity E⁰ » base (βE⁰).
2- The « Entity E¹ » base (derived from the division of Entity E⁰ into two entities) (βE¹).
3- The « Natural System » base (S¹U / βS¹U).
4- The « Iª » base, or « human being » base (βIª).
Following on from previous articles, the problem within which human beings evolve can be framed as follows:
Disruptions arise in the unfolding of History (as originally envisioned by the imagination of Entity E⁰).
Corrections and adjustments must be applied to the course of History.
The various types of adjustments, corresponding to the different types of bases, are as follows:
1- At the level of the « Imagination of E⁰ » base (βE⁰), the Imagination of E⁰ modifies and corrects the unfolding of History through the evolution of entities E¹ and E². These modifications and adjustments are fundamental—or structural—in nature. They are slow-acting processes.
2- At the level of the « Entity E¹ » base (βE¹ / βE²), modifications and adjustments occur in relation to the evolution of the Natural System. These are termed « intermediate » or « conceptual » adjustments; they are brought about by modifying the configurations of the « combination machines » that constitute the Natural System. 3- Within the Natural System (βS¹U), corrections and adjustments are made in response to the evolution of « combination machines »—such as human beings. These adjustments pertain to the operational mechanisms of these combination machines and are classified as minor, or « functional, » adjustments. They serve as instantaneous corrections and fine-tuning, occurring in the wake of « mû shocks »—which are themselves the consequences of E¹–E² relationships (see the entries in the Yparcho System books).
These modifications, corrections, and adjustments inevitably lead to changes in the behavior of the combination machines in question—and, by extension, of human beings.
Under the « High Hypothesis » (Hh), the Natural System has altered the design and construction of human beings, transforming them into ultra-sophisticated combination machines. This enhances their efficiency, allowing for more effective reactions when faced with mû shocks.
These changes primarily involve strengthening the protective mechanisms designed to insulate human beings from mû shocks (refer to the relevant entries in the Yparcho System books).
A corollary to this is a profound shift in human behavior.
This results in the following sequence:
[Human being = ordinary combination machine] —–> [very powerful mû shocks] —–> [alteration of the human being’s construction] —–> [significant changes in human behavior] —–> [significant alterations to the human environment, brought about by human beings]
In terms of « natural logic »:
Human beings bear no responsibility whatsoever for these changes to their environment.
Votre commentaire