Continuation of article R.7.
Reminder:
The term « BASE » is used for an element when it designates a point (or field, or angle) from which a situation is perceived.
The Yparcho system describes 4 points of perception:
1- The « Imagination of Entity E⁰ » base. βψ.
2- The « Entity E¹ » base (derived from the division of Entity E⁰ into two entities). βE¹.
3- The « Natural System » base (S¹U). βS¹U.
4- The « Iª » base, or « human being » base. βIª.
Following on from previous articles, the nature of the problem within which human beings evolve is as follows:
Disruptions arise in the unfolding of History (as originally envisioned by the imagination of Entity E⁰).
Corrections and adjustments must be made to History.
These various types of corrections and adjustments are carried out in relation to the different types of bases:
1- At the level of the « Imagination of E⁰ » base (βE⁰), the Imagination of E⁰ modifies and corrects the course of History through the evolution of entities E¹ and E². These modifications and adjustments are fundamental or structural in nature. They are slow-acting processes.
2- At the level of the « Entity E¹ » base (βE¹, βE²), modifications and adjustments are made in relation to the evolution of the Natural System and the « Void » (Néant) system. These modifications and adjustments are classified as intermediate. These are termed « conceptual adjustments » applied to the Natural System, achieved by modifying the construction of the « combination machines » that compose it.
3- Within the Natural System (βS¹U), corrections and adjustments are made in relation to the evolution of combination machines, such as human beings. These adjustments target the operational mechanisms of these machines and are classified as minor, or « functional, » adjustments. They consist of instantaneous corrections and fine-tuning in response to mû shocks—which are the consequences of E¹–E² interactions (see the articles in the Yparcho system books).
Such modifications, corrections, and adjustments inevitably lead to changes in the behavior of the affected combination machines—and, by extension, human beings.
Under the « High Hypothesis » (Hh), the Natural System has altered the design and construction of human beings, transforming them into ultra-sophisticated combination machines. This enhances their efficiency, enabling them to produce better reactions when faced with mû shocks.
These changes were primarily brought about by adjusting the power of the protective mechanism designed to insulate humans from mû shocks (see all relevant articles on this subject in the Yparcho system books).
A corollary to this is a profound shift in human behavior.
This results in the following sequence:
[Human being = ordinary combination machine] —–> [very powerful mû shocks] —–> [modification of the human being’s construction] —–> [significant changes in human behavior] —–> [significant alterations to the human environment, brought about by human beings]
In terms of « natural logic »:
Human beings bear no responsibility whatsoever for the modifications to their environment.
Votre commentaire