Psychologie système YPARCHO

October 30, 2024

ON HYPNOTIC TRANCE:

HYPNOTIC TRANCE, or H.T., IS A STATE, that is to say, THE RESULT (production of movements or images) OBTAINED by a MECHANISM OF FUNCTIONING, when the result has been constructed from a supply of erroneous or nonexistent data.

This erroneous or virtual result, that is to say, nonexistent, is accepted and validated by all other mechanisms as being a real and accurate result and therefore used or usable.

The movements or images produced will be erroneous or nonexistent, but considered to conform to the natural system and therefore validated as existing.

HYPNOTIC TRANZE = erroneous or unreal results + non-existence (in terms of logic and principles) for the universal system.

When ELMs produce erroneous images validated by all their mechanisms, they are said to be in a Hypnotic Trance.

THE PRODUCTION OF ERRONEOUS THOUGHTS OCCURS IN A STATE OF HYPNOTIC TRANZE.

This state of hypnotic trance disappears at the same time as the protective mechanism ceases to function.

And the protective mechanism ceases to function when the effects of the mucosal shock cease.

It must therefore be considered that it is the human being who keeps the protective mechanism active.

The absence of decision-making power in the human being compels Yπ to seek explanations that correspond to the profile of the human being, concerning the entire implementation of the hallucination by the human being.

---

Yπ, using a hypothesis-driven approach, is moving towards a very slow process of understanding the ESTABLISHMENT OF THE VIRTUAL SYSTEM, the highest hypothesis of which would lead to the origin of an IMPRECISE IN THE NATURAL SYSTEM regarding the conception and construction of the human being.

ACCORDING TO THE NATURAL PRINCIPLE:

The responsibility for THE EXISTENCE OF THE VIRTUAL SYSTEM, in terms of its conception and construction, lies solely with the natural system. The human being is never held directly responsible, due to their inherent lack of responsibility.

The responsibility of the human being is therefore indirect: the responsibility of the natural system is channeled through the human being.

Verifying the hypothesis of an error in the natural system would then lead to the resolution of two fundamental modifications:

– the disappearance of human beings,

OR AND

– significant modifications in their design and construction, likely to cause them to lose their status as ultra-sophisticated combination-machines.

They would revert to ordinary combination-machines.

---

REMINDER AND NOTE:

The following high-level hypothesis:

« The fusion of the two entities involves unsuccessful attempts, »

imposes the appealing idea that the fusion attempts fail because the systems designed by the two entities are imperfect BUT are slowly moving towards perfection:

Only « two systems jointly possessing a perfect construction » will allow fusion.

By adhering to this lofty hypothesis, human beings will:

EITHER DISAPPEAR,

OR PERFECT THEMSELVES.